How geographically distributed is your portfolio?

This map isnโ€™t just a visual – itโ€™s a signal of where future growth lies.

Over the past few years, geopolitical shifts, supply chain realignments, & the rise of new consumer classes have been redrawing the global business map.

It forces global leaders to rethink their strategies: ๐Ÿฐ ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—”๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฎ.

Itโ€™s a reminder that Asia isnโ€™t just part of the global economy – demographically, it IS the global economy.


โ–ถ๏ธ Were you fully aware of this fact?

โฉ I wasn’t. I couldn’t believe it until I took out the calculator & added up the population numbers of those countries in yellow.
It’s true.

What’s your takeaway from this?

Ok, now you might say that population numbers don’t equal economic power and/or stock market capitalization.

GDP is a commonly used, although flawed, yardstick to measure economic strength.

Those 20 countries highlighted in yellow currently contribute a share of around 28% to the global GDP.

Quite a gap to 50%.

But their share has been consistently growing y-o-y. It was as low as 4% back in 1960.

Do you invest in the past, present, or for the future?

Is your portfolio equally weighted according to these two halves?

I am curious, why or why not?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.